<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on usage.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ampersand.gosedesign.net/thoughts-on-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ampersand.gosedesign.net/thoughts-on-usage/</link>
	<description>A scribal abbreviation for and. Derived from the Latin word "et."</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 19:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dfischer</title>
		<link>http://ampersand.gosedesign.net/thoughts-on-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>dfischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampersand.gosedesign.net/?p=136#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I don't think that's proper.

Then again, I'm only basing it off the dictionary definition:

ampersand &#124;ˈampərˌsand&#124;
noun
the sign &#38; (standing for and, as in Smith &#38; Co., or the Latin et, as in &#38;c.).
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: alteration of and per se and ‘ &#38; by itself is and,’ chanted as an aid to learning the sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s proper.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m only basing it off the dictionary definition:</p>
<p>ampersand |ˈampərˌsand|<br />
noun<br />
the sign &amp; (standing for and, as in Smith &amp; Co., or the Latin et, as in &amp;c.).<br />
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: alteration of and per se and ‘ &amp; by itself is and,’ chanted as an aid to learning the sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
